Reliable Clinical Experts provides board-certified gastroenterologists who evaluate colonoscopy technique, endoscopic procedures, and GI diagnosis — delivering authoritative testimony in digestive disease malpractice cases.
Request Gastroenterology ExpertGastroenterology expert witnesses are board-certified physicians who evaluate endoscopic procedures, digestive disease diagnosis, and GI treatment. Reliable Clinical Experts matches attorneys with gastroenterologists who assess missed colon cancer, colonoscopy complications, ERCP injuries, and inflammatory bowel disease management.
Gastroenterology combines medical management of digestive diseases with procedural expertise in colonoscopy, upper endoscopy, and ERCP. Reliable Clinical Experts GI experts understand adenoma detection rate benchmarks, proper polypectomy technique, and procedural complication management. They evaluate whether colonoscopies met quality standards, whether procedural complications resulted from technical errors, and whether diagnostic workups were adequate.
Reliable Clinical Experts matches your case with gastroenterology experts who combine active clinical practice with courtroom experience.
Reliable Clinical Experts gastroenterology experts evaluate these critical aspects of your case.
Gastroenterology malpractice often involves missed colon cancer from inadequate colonoscopy technique or improper surveillance intervals. Reliable Clinical Experts gastroenterologists explain to juries what polyp detection rates are acceptable, whether procedural complications resulted from technique errors, and how earlier cancer detection would have changed prognosis. Their testimony establishes the causation link between substandard colonoscopy and advanced colorectal cancer.
Reliable Clinical Experts provides expert witnesses for these gastroenterology litigation matters.
Perforation, bleeding, or splenic injury from endoscopic procedures
Failure to detect polyps or cancer due to inadequate colonoscopy technique
Post-ERCP pancreatitis, perforation, or biliary injury
Failure to diagnose inflammatory bowel disease, celiac disease, or GI malignancy
From case intake through trial testimony — our streamlined process delivers qualified gastroenterology experts.
Provide case details, clinical issues, and medical records for expert review.
We identify board-certified experts with relevant subspecialty experience.
Your expert analyzes records and provides standard of care opinion.
The same expert provides deposition and trial testimony.
Common questions about Reliable Clinical Experts gastroenterology expert witness services.
Reliable Clinical Experts gastroenterologists testify that adenoma detection rates should be at least 25% in men and 15% in women over age 50 — quality benchmarks established by gastroenterology societies. Our experts review withdrawal time, cecal intubation rates, bowel preparation quality, and photodocumentation to assess colonoscopy quality. Consistently low detection rates or missing large obvious polyps indicates substandard technique.
Reliable Clinical Experts GI experts testify that perforation occurs in approximately 1 in 1,000 colonoscopies, and not all perforations represent negligence. However, perforations from excessive force, advancing without adequate visualization, or failure to promptly recognize and manage perforation can constitute malpractice. Our experts evaluate technique, patient anatomy, and complication response to establish standard of care.
Reliable Clinical Experts provides expert witnesses across related specialties.